Home | Subcommittee on Transportation Communications | Contact Us

Categories
Frequently Asked Questions

Bridge Terms Definitions

Bridge Statistics & Facts

Highway & Bridge Funding Needs

Bridge Contacts

Other Resources and Links

Highways and Bridges


The U.S. highway system includes nearly 4 million miles of public roads, including 46,837 miles of interstate and 115,319 miles of other National Highway System routes. About 76 percent of these roads are locally owned, with 20 percent state owned, and 3 percent federal.

NHS Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement Estimates

The National Bridge Investment Analysis System (NBIAS) model analyzes rehabilitation and replacement investment for all bridges, including those on the NHS. The current NHS bridge investment backlog is estimated to be at least $32.1 billion (in 2004 dollars).

Exhibit 1-1 describes what the NHS bridge backlog after 20 years would be at different funding levels. An average annual investment in bridge rehabilitation and replacement of at least $3.5 billion in constant 2004 dollars would be required so that the NHS bridge investment backlog would not increase above its current level over a 20-year period. An average annual investment of at least $5.1 billion (in 2004 dollars) is estimated to be sufficient to eliminate the existing NHS bridge investment backlog and correct other deficiencies that are expected to develop over the next 20 years, where it is cost-beneficial to do so.

Exhibit 1-1
Projected NHS Bridge Investment Backlog in 2024

for Different Possible Funding Levels


Average Annual
Investment
(billion)

2024 NHS Bridge Backlog (billion)

$5.1

$0.0

$4.8

$5.6

$4.6

$11.1

$4.4

$15.0

$3.9

$24.2

$3.5

$32.1

$3.1

$40.1

$2.6

$52.5


Bridge rehabilitation expenditures on the NHS totaled at least $4.8 billion in 2004. If this level of investment were maintained in constant dollar terms over 20 years, NBIAS projects that the bridge investment backlog would decline to at least $5.6 billion (in 2004 dollars).



Key National Studies on Transportation Funding


National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) study
“Future Funding Options to Meet Highway and Transit Needs,” December 2006

This NCHRP study forecasts that fuel and vehicle taxes are likely to continue to be the mainstay of transportation funding. Tolling in most congested urban corridors is becoming an increasingly important capacity expansion tool. The use of existing and emerging finance tools and public private partnerships can play a role in raising additional investment capitol and advancing project delivery.


“Transportation Research Board Special Report 285: The Fuel Tax and Alternatives for Transportation Funding,” April 2006

This report assesses current revenue practices and advances the following funding possibilities: Create an extensive system of tolled limited access highways and expressway lanes employing existing electronic toll collection technology and variable pricing; the use of ramp metering and mileage charging for the costs of individual trips offers the best opportunity for increasing the cost-effectiveness of transportation spending and mitigating congestion; maintain and reinforce the existing user-fee finance system.


National Conference of State Legislatures “Surface Transportation Funding Options for States,” May 2006

This report analyzes needs and options for state legislators and explores funding obstacles to surface transportation funding decisions. The report finds that many challenges—including the declining value of the gas tax against inflation, opposition to tax and fee increases, citizen initiatives, constitutional and statutory restrictions on the use of gas tax revenues, and federal lawmaking—significantly affect state transportation resources. There are a variety of other options can be used to provide a more balanced approach to transportation funding. Some are as simple as eliminating the diversion of transportation-derived revenues to non-transportation purposes. Options include many procurement tools to speed project delivery or lower projects costs, tapping private investment through public-private partnerships, using different bond and financing mechanisms, and utilizing different matching options to better leverage funds used on federal-aid transportation projects.



AASHTO also has several key reports on transportation investment needs and funding options, including those listed below


Future Needs of the U.S. Surface Transportation System, February 2007
This report contains a comprehensive assessment of transportation needs today and in the future, and the demographic and economic changes that will shape that future.

Surface Transportation Policy Recommendations, March 2007
This report contains recommendations from AASHTO on the nation’s surface transportation system in order to keep the U.S. competitive internationally.

Revenue Sources to Fund Transportation Needs, April 2007
This report addresses revenue options, needs assessment in terms of federal, state and local. Long-term federal options are also addressed.

A New Vision for the 21st Century, July 2007
This report outlines a “conceptual plan” to ensure our surface transportation system will meet America’s needs, and a transportation “vision” for our future. Funding recommendations are also addressed.

U.S. DOT “Value Pricing Studies” underway
This Web site offers a quarterly report on current value pricing studies currently underway in the United States with funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation.