DOT Page Heading


Click here to view a PDF version of this Section.

>Definitions

>Chapter 1

>Chapter 2:

>Chapter 3:

>Appendix One

>Appendix Two

>Appendix Three

>Appendix Four

>Appendix Five

 

 
 

Chapter Two: Creating Your Community Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan

Step 5: Pedestrian System Planning

Pedestrian planning differs from bicycle planning partly because almost everyone walks. Individuals from every age group and ability level use the pedestrian environment and most destinations need to be accessible by walking. People may be walking less these days, especially in environments that lack pedestrian accommodations. However, many communities are attempting to reverse this trend since walking is healthful, brings people in contact with their neighbors, and offers mobility to those who cannot or choose not to drive.

A pedestrian friendly community must provide facilities that allow people to walk safely. In some circumstances, roadways and developments must be retrofitted to make walking easier and more inviting. Facilities alone will not encourage walking. Revitalizing downtowns and planning for density and mixed-use development are equally important.


Pedestrian Network Criteria

The Pedestrian Transportation System

Pedestrian facilities, like those for any transportation mode, are most effective when they are part of a system that assures connections, continuity, access, and safety. A community-wide system of facilities that is well designed and maintained is essential. It is important to consider the needs of pedestrians during transportation and development projects. In an interconnected pedestrian system, sidewalks are continuous; crossing streets safely is made possible; and, where appropriate, measures are taken to slow automobile traffic.

The Sidewalk Corridor

In most communities, sidewalks are the primary transportation facility for walking. As such, the sidewalk system must be continuous and provide access to all pedestrian destinations. The sidewalk corridor is usually parallel to the road from corner to corner. It encompasses the area from the edge of the road to the property line and provides an area for walking, separated from vehicle traffic, and additional space for signs, streetscaping, and amenities. It must be adequately maintained to remain useful.


Ames, Iowa has revitalized the CBD

Criteria for a Good Sidewalk Corridor

Sidewalks and ADA
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that new and altered public sidewalks and street crossings be accessible. Design standards for not exist for these improvements but local governments, are, nevertheless, required to create accessible pedestrian facilities. New design guidance is available for public rights-of-way, sidewalks and trails in a newly released publication: Accessible Rights of Way: A Design Guide. (See Chapter Three for information.)

For more information about ADA requirements, contact the U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, (Access Board) at
http://www.access-board.gov

Phone: (800) 872-2253

Accessibility – Sidewalks should be easily accessible to individuals of all ability levels.

Continuity and Connectedness – As the primary transportation facility for walking, the sidewalk route should be clear to users and should not be interrupted by gaps and intervening obstacles and conflicting uses.

Safety – Sidewalks should be adequately separated from traffic, well lighted and free of dangerous surface irregularities.

Landscaping – Trees and landscaping within the sidewalk corridor should be used to contribute to physical, psychological and visual comfort.

Social Space – The social aspect of sidewalk corridors should not be ignored so that standing, sitting, visiting and children's play can occur.

Community Form – Sidewalk corridors should be recognized as a community asset and used to contribute to the character of neighborhoods and business districts, and to strengthen community identity.

Street Corners

Street corners are busy places. They are of vital importance to the safe integration of automobile and pedestrian traffic. Here, people socialize, buy their newspapers, mail letters, and window shop while waiting for changing lights or buses. The most dangerous and complicated part of an individual's walk – crossing intersections – occurs at street corners. Street corners house much of the hardware (traffic signals, etc.) that controls the complicated movements at intersections.

Criteria for a Good Street Corner

The following elements should be provided to ensure safe and well functioning street corners.

Adequate Space – Corners should be large enough to accommodate the typical number of pedestrians waiting to cross, congregating for social reasons or waiting for transit. They also must be able to accommodate curb ramps, poles and signs, as well as street furniture, transit shelters and other amenities.

Separation From Traffic – Corner design should effectively discourage the encroachment of motor vehicles into the pedestrian area.

Visibility – Pedestrians must be able to see and be seen by motorists at all times. Traffic controls and signals must also be visible from the pedestrian perspective.

Legibility – Signals, signs and pavement markings should communicate clear messages to the pedestrian.

Accessibility – All corner features including ramps, landings, call buttons, pavement markings and textures must meet ADA standards.

Crosswalks

Transportation planning has, "...responded to traffic congestion...by recommending that we build additional roads. Two-lane streets are widened with turning lanes, intersections are expanded, two lanes become four, and four lanes become six. Wider roads attract more traffic and more traffic going at faster speeds makes walking more dangerous."

– Mean Streets 1998
Surface Transportation Policy Project

Crosswalks accommodate the most hazardous stage of any pedestrian trip, crossing the street. The purpose of crosswalks is to concentrate pedestrian crossing movements so that the potential number of conflict points between pedestrians and motor vehicles are reduced. There are two types of crosswalks: marked and unmarked.

Crosswalks are the natural extension of the sidewalk at corners (or if there is no sidewalk, the area that would extend if there were a sidewalk). The majority of crosswalks are unmarked. Crosswalks are sometimes marked at mid-block locations. Pedestrians have the right-of-way at crosswalks but are required by law to obey traffic control devices and laws.

Criteria for Good Crosswalks

Clarity – It is clear where to cross and easy to understand possible conflict points with traffic.

Visibility – Pedestrians can see and be seen by approaching traffic lighting is adequate and obstacles and the location of the crosswalk do not obscure the view.

Appropriate Intervals – The potential demand for crossing is reasonably well served by available crossing opportunities.

Adequate Crossing Time – The pedestrian is allotted or can take an adequate amount of time to cross and does not need to wait an unreasonably long time to begin crossing.

Limited Exposure – The distance required to cross is short or it is divided into shorter segments with median refuges.

Continuous Path – The crosswalk is a direct extension of the pedestrian travel path and is free of obstacles and hazards.


Identifying Priority Service Areas

Walking trips are short trips. Unlike bicyclists who sometimes want to traverse an entire city or region, pedestrians tend to do most of their walking close to home, work, school and commercial activity areas, like central business districts and shopping centers. Some of the areas where pedestrian considerations should and often do occur, include:

  • Central business districts
  • School routes
  • Residential areas
  • University/college areas

Additional areas of attention where pedestrian considerations should, but often do not, occur include:

  • Access to downtown from surrounding neighborhoods
  • Arterial and collector roadways that serve commercial and residential areas
  • Neighborhood commercial areas
  • Access to parks and community centers
  • Hospitals and elderly housing facilities

Product/Action

Define priority pedestrian service areas in your community using existing conditions information and the public participation process.


Evaluating Current Conditions for Pedestrians

Conditions can be precarious for pedestrians. Sometimes, there are no sidewalks or they are in poor condition. The roadway is intimidating with fast traffic, wide intersections, dangerous freeway exits, and inadequate opportunities to cross safely. There are long distances and no pedestrian connections between adjacent developments.

Several tools can help to evaluate local conditions:

Pedestrian Audits

"Pedestrians and vehicles must have equal status in analyzing the options at an intersection, and thus, some loss in motor vehicle capacity may be necessary to accommodate pedestrians."

Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities,
a recommended practice of the Institute of Transportation Engineers

One of the best ways to evaluate a community's pedestrian environment is to conduct one or more "pedestrian audits." These are "walks" taken in various neighborhoods during which citizens and public officials answer questions about the walking environment. These informal exercises usually reveal a great deal about the walking environment. Even more insights are gained when children and people with disabilities participate in these audits. (See Appendix Four for a sample audit.)

Sidewalk Inventory

For communities with a significant number of sidewalks, it is useful to inventory existing sidewalks, their condition, missing sections and roads that have no sidewalks at all. If an entire inventory cannot be conducted in the planning process, citizens can often supply some of this information at a public meeting - they will identify the missing pieces that matter to them.

Crosswalk Inventory

It is also helpful to consider the pedestrian crossing environment as a whole system. Which signalized crosswalks have walk phases? Are signals visible to pedestrians? Are traffic gaps adequate at non-signalized intersections?

Hazard Reporting

Some communities have adopted programs through which pedestrians and bicyclists can report hazardous conditions. A complementary "spot improvement" program allocates a relatively small budget to quickly fix minor problems. More expensive and difficult problems are included in future planning and programming. (See Appendix Four for a sample hazard reporting card.)

Analysis of Pedestrian Capacity

The 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), offers an extensive treatment of pedestrian capacity. It describes the basic principles of pedestrian traffic flow and procedures for the analysis of pedestrian facilities. The intended use of the HCM analysis techniques is to assess and plan for adequate capacity at locations of concentrated pedestrian activity - especially sidewalks, crosswalks and street corners. A balance is sought between the needs of pedestrians and motor vehicles.

Product/Action

  • Use public participation process to conduct pedestrian audit to assess general conditions and define needs.
  • Inventory sidewalks and produce a spreadsheet indicating missing segments, gaps and state of repair.
  • Examine all or a sample of representative intersection locations and identify problem locations for pedestrian crossing.
  • Develop prototype solutions for common conditions at intersections.
  • Consider adoption of a hazard reporting and "spot improvement program."


Draft Pedestrian Network Plan

Developing specific pedestrian plans that address design options and policies that favorably impact walking is a relatively new activity for municipal government. A local pedestrian plan is generally policy driven. The City of Portland, Oregon, adopted a pedestrian plan that developed prototype design and policies to improve conditions in the primary sub-areas of the walking environment: the sidewalk corridor, street corners, and crosswalks. Designs and policies were adopted to complete the sidewalk network, to improve the pedestrian capacity and safety of street corners, and to increase the safety of crossing streets.

The evaluation process will have identified many needs. Facility improvements will be developed based upon these needs. Many communities annually program sidewalk in-fill projects as well as assuring that sidewalks are built with new road and development projects.

The Institute of Transportation Engineers suggests the following guidance for sidewalk installation (See Table 3). Intersection reconstruction projects offer the opportunity to assess conditions for pedestrians at the corner and in the crosswalks. Crosswalk pavement markings, traffic control and signal improvement projects, curb cut installations and other projects to address special pedestrian needs are sometimes programmed separately. The pedestrian network plan will be dependent on policies to ensure progress on the sidewalk network and include pedestrian considerations in other roadway projects.

Product/Action

  • Draft policies to build, in-fill and maintain sidewalks, to improve intersections and crossing opportunities, and to slow traffic in specific areas.
  • Prioritize sidewalk in-fill and repair needs considering priority service areas, information on the sidewalk inventory, and sidewalk installation guidance to determine relative importance.
  • Identify difficult intersections and prioritize improvements according to priority service areas and public input.
  • Determine if traffic should be slowed in some locations to address safety concerns; prioritize locations.
  • Refer to Appendix One for pedestrian and traffic calming design considerations and references.
  • Develop cost estimates for elements of program improvements based on local prices.
  • Present Draft Plan at public meetings and incorporate comments.

Table 3: ITE Sidewalk Installation Guidance

Land Use/Roadway Functional Classification and Dwelling Unit New Urban and Suburban Streets Existing Urban and Suburban Streets

Commercial and Industrial (All Streets)

Both sides

Both sides. Every effort should be made to add sidewalks where they do not exist and complete missing links.


Residential (Major Arterials)

Both sides.

Both sides.


Residential (Collectors)

Both sides.

Multifamily-both sides.

   

Single family dwellings-prefer both sides; require at least one side.


Residential (Local Streets) More than 4 Units Per Acre

Both sides.

Prefer both sides; require at least one side.


1 to 4 Units per Acre

Prefer both sides; require at least one side.

At least 4-foot shoulder on both sides required.


Less than 1 Unit per Acre

One side preferred; shoulder on both sides required.

One side preferred, at least 4-foot shoulder on both sides required.

 

Notes:

1) Any local street within two blocks of a school site that would be on a walking route to school sidewalk and curb and gutter required.

2) Sidewalks may be omitted on one side of a new street where that side clearly cannot be developed and where there are no existing or anticipated uses that would generate pedestrian trips on that side.

3) Where there are service roads, the sidewalk adjacent to the main road may be eliminated and replaced by a sidewalk adjacent to the service road on the side away from the main road.

4) For rural roads not likely to serve development, a shoulder at least 4 feet in width, preferably 8 feet on primary highways, should be provided. Surface material should provide a stable, mud-free walking surface.

Source: Charles V. Zeeger, et al,

 

 

<< Previous | Index | Ordering Information | Next >>


This page was created for the Iowa DOT by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. and Dunbar Jones Partnership. This page is maintained by Jay Larson jay.larson@dot.iowa.gov. Your questions and comments are welcome.

©2000 Iowa Department of Transportation

State of Iowa Home Page Iowa DOT Home Page