DOT Page Heading


Click here to view a PDF version of this Section.


 

 
 

Background/Purpose:

The Iowa Department of Transportation is in the process of preparing an update to the 1989 Iowa state trail plan. This update, known as Iowa Trails 2000, will serve as a resource document for trail implementers throughout the state. A number of types of trail user groups, including off-highway vehicle (OHV) users, have been considered in this trail planning effort. In order to better understand the use characteristics, needs and expectations of OHV users, the project Technical Advisory Committee decided that a survey of OHV users should be conducted in conjunction with the Iowa Trails 2000 process. The intent of the survey was not to represent a statistically valid survey sample; rather, the survey responses were intended to give state agencies a general understanding of what the needs and wants of OHV users are.

< top >

Methodology:

The Iowa Department of Transportation and Department of Natural Resources, in conjunction with SRF Consulting Group, Inc., designed the survey form. Survey questions requested information on OHV ownership, trail use, desired trail amenities and qualities. This survey was mailed to 800 OHV owners in January, 2000. The mailing list for survey distribution was compiled from OHV and snowmobile user lists supplied by the OHV representative on the Technical Advisory Committee.

Approximately half (396) of the surveys were returned to the Iowa Department of Transportation prior to April 1, 2000. Initial review of the survey responses received identified that 184 of the survey respondents had misread the instructions on two or more key questions, which would have impacted tabulation of responses to those questions. Therefore, those surveys were not tabulated. The data from the remaining 212 surveys was input into a Microsoft Access database. Response frequencies, percentages and ranges were calculated and are summarized below.

< top >

Summary of Survey Results:


Types of Vehicles and their Use

The many types of off-highway vehicles have a wide variety of uses. The type of vehicle and its use will have an impact on the number and type of facilities that the state of Iowa may consider developing. To assist the state in the possible development of additional facilities, OHV owners were asked questions regarding their vehicles and use. Responses were received from the following survey questions.

Survey Question 1: What type(s) of motorized off-highway vehicle (OHV) do you own (check all that apply)?

Vehicle Type

Number

Percentage*

Snowmobile

151

48.2

Trail Bike

48

15.3

Dual Sport

14

4.5

4-Wheel (ATV)

92

29.4

Other

8

2.6

*Percentage is calculated based on a total of 313 vehicles. Some respondents had more than one OHV.

 

Survey Question 2: Is your OHV registered?

Registration Status

Number

Percentage*

Yes

200

94.4

No

6

2.8

No Answer

6

2.8

*Percentage is calculated based on a total of 212 surveys.

The number of respondents that indicated their vehicles were registered is significantly above the national average. It is likely that the distribution of the survey is responsible for this result.

 

Survey Question 3: How do you use your OHV?

Vehicle Use

Number

Percentage*

Competition

24

6.7

Farming

55

15.2

Hunting

31

8.6

Pleasure Riding

211

58.6

Work

33

9.2

Other

6

1.7

*Percentage is calculated based on 360 responses. Some respondents selected more than one type of use for their vehicle.

For respondents that selected "other," a blank space was provided so that the respondent could indicate what other purpose their OHV was used for. The six respondents noted that they used their OHV for landscape work, OHV park riding, trail riding, vacation/pleasure, emergencies and checking on other farms and livestock.

It should be noted that four surveys, which were not tabulated in the above table, were turned in that selected "work" as the sole use of their vehicle. These surveys were not included in the final selection of 212 surveys because they did not respond to the rest of the survey since it did not apply to them.

 

Survey Question 4: Do you generally go riding with: family, friends or alone?

Ride With

Number

Percentage*

Family

143

40.2

Friends

192

53.9

Alone

21

5.9

*Percentage is calculated based on 356 responses. Some of the 212 surveys that were used in tabulating results had more than one of the options selected.

 

Survey Question 5: Are you a member of an OHV club?

Member

Number

Percentage*

Yes

188

88.7

No

20

9.4

No Answer

4

1.9

*Percentage is calculated based on 212 surveys evaluated.


Analysis

The majority of OHV owners have a snowmobile or an ATV that is registered with the state. Most of these owners use their vehicles for pleasure riding or farming. The registration percentage appears to be high. This may be a reflection on the fact that the survey was circulated to club members. These figures should be validated with some contact with enforcement personnel or others associated with the sport before they are used to project the total OHV population in Iowa.

Owners of OHVs generally do not ride alone; they usually ride with friends or family. In many cases, individuals own multiple vehicles to facilitate this activity. With 313 vehicles owned by 212 respondents, it shows that nearly half of the enthusiasts own more than one machine. This can result from an individual owning a snowmobile for the winter activities and another OHV for the summer, or a family owning two or more of the same type of vehicle for family outings.

The data show that a majority of owners belong to an OHV club. However, this may be more reflective of the distribution process rather than the actual club membership levels. In most other states, club membership penetration is closer to 20 percent to 30 percent. Further analysis may be necessary to validate this information. Some simple enthusiast interviews at the riding areas may provide the necessary information.


Where Owners Ride and the Factors that Influence Where They Go

There are many factors that influence where an OHV owner may choose to ride his or her vehicle. Questions regarding these factors are summarized below.

Survey Question 6: Do you generally ride (rate 1 (most frequent), 2, 3, 4 (least frequent): on your own land, in road right-of-way, on other private land, or on designated OHV trails?

 Where Ride

Frequency

1

2

3

4

On Own Land

42
(18.8%)

45
(22.7%)

43
(22.4%)

68
(34.7%)

On Other Private Land

31
(13.8%)

56
(28.3%)

73
(38.1%)

42
(21.4%)

In Road Rights-of-Way

43
(19.2%)

53
(26.8%)

45
(23.4%)

58
(29.6%)

On Designated Trails

108
(48.2%)

44
(22.2%)

31
(16.1%)

28
(14.3%)

It should be noted that some of the surveys were not completely filled in. For example, some respondents ranked only two of the four choices and left the other two options blank. Some respondents ranked everything as "1". As a result, the total for each number does not equal 212. Percentages were calculated based on the total number of responses for each frequency level (e.g., "1", "2", etc.).

The results indicated that 67 percent of the respondents ride, most frequently, in road rights-of-way (probably snowmobiles in winter) or in areas with designated trails, with trails representing the largest category, by far. Looking at the chart, one can see that riding on trails is about double any other categories. This clearly points out the need for public trails in the state to satisfy the demand.

Question 7: What factors determine what OHV trail or riding area you use? (Rate 1 (most) – 6 (least) in order of importance)

 Factor

Importance Rating

1

2

3

4

5

6

Distance from Home

73
(34.1%)

27
(12.5%)

29
(13.2%)

28
(13.1%)

26
(12.5%)

15
(7.1%)

Length of Trail

27
(12.6%)

67
(31.0%)

54
(24.7%)

25
(11.7%)

27
(13.0%)

7
(3.3%)

Challenge of Course

20
(9.3%)

29
(13.4%)

32
(14.6%)

20
(9.4%)

27
(13.0%)

50
(24.0%)

Connection Between Points

28
(13.1%)

27
(12.5%)

36
(16.4%)

46
(21.6%)

36
(17.3%)

20
(9.6%)

Winter Ice Riding

16
(7.5%)

9
(4.2%)

8
(3.7%)

22
(10.3%)

23
(11.1%)

51
(24.4%)

Scenery

37
(17.3%)

31
(14.4%)

31
(14.2%)

49
(23.0%)

35
(16.8%)

21
(10.0%)

Proximity to Services

13
(6.1%)

26
(12.0%)

29
(13.2%)

23
(10.8%)

34
(16.3%)

45
(21.5%)

It should be noted that some of the surveys were not completely filled in. For example, some respondents ranked only some of the seven choices and left the other options blank. Some respondents ranked everything as "1." As a result, the total for each number does not equal 212. Percentages were calculated based on the total number of responses for each frequency level (e.g., "1", "2", etc.).

The survey results indicate that the length of the trail and the distance from home influence the selection of a place to ride about equally. One can assume that as available trails increase, the attraction increases; and as distance from home increases, the attraction decreases. Scenery ranks next followed by connections between points. Winter ice riding ranks at the bottom but that is probably an indication of numbers of people who participate and not the desirability of the activity.

Question 8: How far are you willing to travel to use a designated OHV trail that provides one day’s riding experience?

 Time

Number

Percentage*

< 30 Minutes

5

2.4

30 – 60 Minutes

40

18.9

1 – 2 Hours

83

39.1

2 – 5 Hours

54

25.5

5 – 10 Hours

16

7.5

> 10 Hours

9

4.2

No Answer

5

2.4

*Percentage is calculated based on 212 surveys evaluated.

About 60 percent of the respondents are willing to travel up to 2 hours to reach desirable areas. This would indicate that riding areas that are expected to adequately serve population centers should be located within a two-hour drive of the area being served. Distances can probably be increased if the available trail network is increased. Travel distances of over 5 hours are probably reflective of travel out of Iowa.


Use of Facilities within Iowa

A few of the OHV clubs in Iowa run OHV parks that are open to the public. Respondents were asked how often they visited these facilities. They were also asked which facility they preferred and which facility they liked the least. Their responses are listed below.

Question 15: Have you visited any of the OHV areas operated by local clubs and open to the public?

 Location and Frequency

Number

Percentage*

 Bluff Creek – Weekly

5

2.8

 Bluff Creek – Monthly

6

3.4

 Bluff Creek – Quarterly

37

20.9

 Bluff Creek – Not at All

65

36.7

 Bluff Creek – Not Aware

64

36.2


 Rathbun – Weekly

0

0

 Rathbun – Monthly

3

1.7

 Rathbun – Quarterly

30

17.1

 Rathbun – Not at All

81

46.0

 Rathbun – Not Aware

62

35.2


 Ely – Weekly

1

.6

 Ely – Monthly

12

6.8

 Ely – Quarterly

24

13.6

 Ely – Not at All

75

42.6

 Ely – Not Aware

64

36.4


 Waterloo – Weekly

3

1.7

 Waterloo – Monthly

11

6.3

 Waterloo – Quarterly

18

10.3

 Waterloo – Not at All

76

43.4

 Waterloo – Not Aware

67

38.3


 No Answer**

31

14.6

*The total number of responses for each park varies slightly because some respondents were not consistent in filling in an answer for each park. For example, some individuals did not fill in a response for one park, but did for the other three; other respondents only filled in an answer for one park. As a result, percentage was calculated by adding the total responses for each park individually. For example, 177 respondents indicated some answer for Bluff Creek Park. The percentage of those that visited the park weekly was calculated by dividing 5 (number of responses) by 177 (total number of responses received for that park).

**Percentage of "No Answer" was calculated by dividing the number of responses (31) by the total number of surveys evaluated (212).

Many of those that answered this question inserted their local trail system as a place that they used on a regular basis.

At least 72 percent of all respondents indicated that they either did not use any of the areas or were not aware of them. Since the areas are primarily motorcycle and ATV areas, snowmobilers would not be expected to use these areas. Because the survey includes snowmobilers, an attempt should be made to segregate answers to these questions to focus on motocross and ATV users.

Question 15: Which area do you prefer? Why?

Area Preferred

Number

Percentage*

Bluff Creek

26

14.4

Rathbun

3

1.6

Ely

7

3.9

Waterloo

8

4.4

No Answer or Area not Listed**

137

75.7

*Percentage is calculated by dividing the number of responses by 181, the number of people that answered at least a portion of the first part of Question 15 (have you visited any of the OHV areas operated by local clubs and open to the public?).

**Some respondents put their local trail systems or an area that they visited out of state as the area most preferred. Because these responses did not match the parks listed above, they were tabulated as "No Answer." It should be noted that a majority of respondents did not answer this part of Question 15.

Bluff Creek OHV Park was the area most preferred. This location was preferred to the other riding areas because of its size and variety of trails.

Question 15: Which area do you like the least? Why?

 Area Least Preferred

Number

Percentage*

Bluff Creek

2

1.1

Rathbun

7

3.9

Ely

11

6.1

Waterloo

3

1.6

No Answer or Area not Listed**

158

87.3

*Percentage is calculated by dividing the number of responses by 181, the number of people that answered at least a portion of the first part of Question 15 (have you visited any of the OHV areas operated by local clubs and open to the public?).

**Some respondents put all four areas or their local trail system as the area least preferred. Because these responses did not match the parks listed above, they were tabulated as "No Answer." It should be noted that a majority of respondents did not answer this part of Question 15.

Ely OHV Park was the area least preferred. Most of the 11 respondents who indicated that this was the park that they liked the least stated that ruts left by trucks ruined the course for ATVs and trail bikes.


Out-of-State Travel

Questions regarding out-of-state travel by OHV owners were asked in the survey. The results of the survey follow.

Other State

Number

Percentage*

Yes

151

100

No

4

2.6

*Percentage is calculated based on 151 respondents who indicated that they owned a snowmobile. The total percentage exceeds 100 percent because a few individuals that did not own a snowmobile had traveled out of state to ride one while on vacation or visiting relatives.

Question 9a: Which states do you go to?

State

Number

Percentage*

Wisconsin

129

85.4

Minnesota

111

73.5

Illinois

4

2.6

Nebraska

3

2.0

North Dakota

2

1.3

South Dakota

47

31.1

Other**

71

47.0

*Percentage is based on the 151 respondents that indicated that they travel out of state to snowmobile. Because respondents could select more than one state, the total percentage exceeds 100 percent.

**For those respondents that selected "other", the following chart highlights the locations that were visited.

State

Number

Canada

2

Colorado

4

Idaho

5

Michigan

39

Montana

15

Utah

4

West

1

Wyoming

33

Question 9a: Why did you travel to another state for snowmobiling?

A majority of those that responded to this question indicated that the lack of a trail system and lack of adequate snowfall were why they chose to travel out of state. Other responses included the following:

A lot nicer trail system and more snow.

Amount of snow and well-established trails.

Amount of snowfall on the ground.

Amount of snow, great scenery, and extensive trail systems.

Beautiful scenery and protection of forest and developed trail system.

Because of the trail systems' scenery, and upkeep.

Because the quality of the trail system was much better than our own.

Because there was snow and a more extensive trail system.

Because they cater to snowmobilers.

Better and more trails.

Better and safer trails

Better snow and trails.

Better snow conditions and to ride on a designed trail system.

Better snow conditions, many more miles of trail networks.

Better trail system, more snow at the time.

Better trail system, usually more snow.

Better trail systems and better snow conditions.

Better trail systems and motel accommodations, mostly snow conditions are better.

Better trails.

Better trails and better trail markings.

Better trails and generally more snow.

Better trails and more people riding.

Better trails and more scenic and More Snow!

Better trails locations (no flag laws).

Better trails, grooming.

Better trails, more snow.

Better trails, more snow, wider trails, different scenery.

Better trails, more snow.

Better trails, scenery.

Better trails.

Better trails.

Consistent snow, mountains and hospitality.

Cross country trails.

Do not have access to trails in area.

Excellent trail system in southeast Minnesota.

Excellent trails and better snow conditions.

Extensive developed trails and open riding areas, amenities and government acceptance.

For a good trail system and snow conditions.

For fun.

For riding on groomed trails and also to be around larger lakes.

For snow, there is none in our state.

For the conditions of snow on the trails. The length and scenery of the trails.

For vacation and groomed trails.

Friends and clubs.

Generally because snow conditions are better; also better trail systems.

Good trail systems.

Good trails and beautiful scenery.

Groomed trails, scenery, hotels and restaurants.

Groomed trails, trails in the woods.

Groomed, interconnected trails, scenery.

Had relatives living there and they had more snow.

Iowa just does not seem to have enough snow and the trail systems are not great. Plus, other states do not have a useless flag law.

Lack of snow and groomed trails.

Lack of snow in Iowa (rideable snow, that is).

Lack of snow in Iowa and lack of groomed trails in Carroll area.

Lack of snow in my area.

Lack of snow.

Lack of snowmobile trails in southwest Iowa.

Large trail system and groomed trails to snowmobile on.

Love of the sport, scenery, safety of the groomed trails.

Minnesota has the closest good trail. Ride with friends, go to North Dakota to visit friends and go to Wisconsin to visit family.

More designated trails. Mountains.

More miles of trails and better grooming.

More snow – trail system.

More snow and a lot more trails. They like to have us there.

More snow and better trail conditions. Scenery.

More snow and better trail system.

More snow and better trails - it was a vacation.

More snow and better trails.

More snow and better trails.

More snow and better trails.

More snow and better trails.

More snow and better trails.

More snow and excellent trails.

More snow and more trail systems.

More snow more trails.

More snow, better and more trails.

More snow, better groomed trails and to be with friends.

More snow, better scenery and better trails.

More snow, better trail riding and scenery.

More snow, better trail system, food and gas stops on the trail.

More snow, better trail system, hills to climb.

More snow, better trails, vacation.

More snow, good trails and scenery.

More snow, more trails and a change of scenery.

More snow, more trails, more lake riding and resorts, no flags required.

More snow, nice trails, beautiful scenery, nice climatic conditions.

More snow, part of a vacation.

More snow, trails, scenery and new places.

More snow.

More trails to ride.

More trails, more snow.

More trails, more snow and more scenery.

More trails.

Mountain hill trails.

Mountain riding.

Mountain riding, network of trails.

Nebraska doesn’t have trails except for Cunningham Lake, very short trail system.

Nicer trails and better facilities around the trails.

Nicer trails and scenery and lake riding.

No good trails in our area.

No snow in Iowa.

No snow in Iowa.

No trails where I live.

Not enough snow in Iowa. We need to look at grooming. Until we get enough snow then go.

Across fields. This year is a good example.

Not good snowmobiling in Iowa.

Number of groomed trails, accommodations, and snow conditions. Plus less ditch riding.

Open area riding, mountains, meadows, valleys. More areas to ride and they welcome snowmobilers.

Organized state trails and scenery.

Relatives.

Ride.

Safe trails, abundant snow and scenic riding.

Scenery - more lakes and woodland trails - less ground used for farming.

Scenery and snow.

Scenery, more extreme riding, better snow.

Snow and abundance of trails and better acceptance of snowmobilers in general in the state.

Snow and trail systems.

Snow conditions in Iowa have been poor for a few years. Scenery, well marked trail systems that are maintained by groomers.

Snow conditions, different riding types.

Snow conditions, trails.

Snow conditions.

State of Iowa don't give us any trails.

The snowmobile trails are not maintained very well around Mason City, Iowa.

They cater to or target snowmobiles/snowmobile tourism.

They have good trails.

They have trails and snow.

They have trails where you can ride all week without riding the same trail.

To ride in the mountains.

To see different scenery and get away from the phone. Deeper snow.

To see something different. New trails and woods.

Trail system.

Trail system.

Trail systems.

Trail systems.

Trail systems and scenery.

Trails.

Trails.

Trails.

Trails and scenery.

Trails and scenery.

Trails and snow availability.

Trails in Cerro Gordo County are not marked or groomed. They are unsafe to ride. Due to poor work and ignorance. I like to know where our registration money goes.

Trails, people and scenery.

Trails.

Vacation - places where there is snow.

We have little snow.

Wisconsin and Michigan have extensive groomed snowmobile trails.

The attraction of better trails, more snow, grooming and a positive management attitude clearly influence snowmobilers. Nothing can be done about the amount of snow available in Iowa, but improved management of the available snow can help keep people (and dollars) in the state.

Question 9b: Do you go to other states for ATV/trail bike trail use?

Other State

Number

Percentage*

Yes

66

53.2

No

58

46.8

*Percentage is calculated based on 124 surveys in which owners indicated that they owned at least one of the following: ATV, trail bike, dual sport or other.

Question 9b: Which states do you go to?

State

Number

Percentage*

Wisconsin

41

62.1

Minnesota

25

37.9

Illinois

9

13.6

Nebraska

10

15.2

South Dakota

8

12.1

Missouri

27

40.9

Other**

19

28.8

*Percentage is based on the 66 respondents that indicated that they travel out of state to use their ATVs. Because respondents could select more than one state, the total percentage exceeds 100 percent.

**For those respondents that selected "other", the following chart highlights the locations that were visited.

<

State

Number

Arizona

4

Arkansas

3

California

1

Colorado

6

Indiana

1

Kansas

1

Michigan

2

Montana

1

Nevada

2

New York

1

North Carolina

1

Oklahoma

7

Texas

1

Utah

2

Wyoming

1

Question 9b: Why did you travel to another state?

A majority of those that responded to this question indicated that the lack of a trail system and riding areas forced them out of state. Other responses included the following:

1,200 acres of sand is one hell of a good time.

Abundance of trails that give variety.

Availability of trails.

Availability of trails/public riding areas. Not near enough here.

Because I wanted to ride somewhere I had not been before. I got tired of riding in the same area or park.

Because it was different kind of riding than we have around here.

Because there is no public ATV trails within 4 hours of my home in the state of Iowa.

Because there isn't any in the Dubuque area.

Better riding area.

Better trail network.

Better trails.

Better trails and facilities around the trails.

Better trails.

Challenge of course and length of trail. Much better than Iowa.

Change of scenery.

Change of scenery.

Closer than Iowa parks and better riding.

Closer than the parks in Iowa and they offer more.

Diversity of terrain, new experience.

For longer trail rides, scenery, and did not know about the parks in Iowa.

Good riding and scenery.

Groomed, safe trails with trails my whole family can ride on.

Have fun!

Hunting/fishing vacation.

I enjoy a large variety of terrain and trails.

I heard that it was a big park with a lot of challenging trails.

I own some property in northern Minnesota.

Interconnected trails and scenery.

Iowa needs more trails instead of just parks. They have more family orientated trails to ride.

Lack of good trail riding in Iowa.

Larger area to ride (Chadwick, Missouri, has 8000 acres), marked trails, and services close by.

Larger parks with more area for a two- or three-day trip.

Larger ride areas than are available locally plus linear trails are available in Wisconsin.

Length of trails, more places to ride.

More places to ride.

More trails to choose from, better trails.

More trails, winter riding areas.

Much better, larger, and greater number of riding areas.

Much more variety of riding areas, more trails/OHV areas, scenery.

New place to ride, closer to home vs southwest Iowa. Have to go 2-5 hours in Iowa.

New trails.

Nice trails.

Nice trails going from place to place.

No 4 wheel trails in Waterloo.

No comment provided.

No trails in northeastern Iowa.

None closer to home - able to ride town to town for gas, food, lodging, etc.

Not enough good trails in Iowa.

Only one I know of that is only an hour away. It is challenging.

Sand dunes and scenery.

Size of riding area, different terrain, vacation with family and new riding.

State riding parks.

The trails are much better and they have much more area.

There are no trails or OHV parks in northern Iowa. Why?

There is nowhere to ride in western Iowa.

They have a great ATV trail system.

They have great trails marked out with great scenery.

They have large trail systems. They cater to quad riders.

They offer so much variety of trail systems and recognize importance of ATV’s need for places to ride and enjoy the sport.

Trails.

Vacation.

Variety. Most other states have camping or lodging with trail access. A lot are state parks.

We worked it into vacation plans.

Well kept and nice riding area.

Went to a race - took unit.

Went to see relatives.

 

As with snowmobilers, more trails, better scenery, larger areas and a variety of terrain attract ATV riders. These are the types of characteristics that should be considered when areas are reviewed for acquisition. Providing a variety of terrain and scenery significantly increases the rider experience. While mine dumps and gravel pits may satisfy some of the riders, they do not attract the long-term family type riding that is desired.

Question 10: When you go riding, how many days are spent on an average trip?

Number of Days

Number

Percentage*

0

1

0

1 or 2

49

23.4

3 or 4

94

44.4

5 or 6

45

21.2

> 6

17

8.1

No Answer

6

2.9

*Percentage is calculated based on 212 surveys evaluated.

It appears that most out-of-state trips occur over weekends, holidays or extended vacations. This is to be expected since most day use will occur close to home.


Trail Characteristics

There are a number of characteristics that can make a trail desirable for a rider. The following questions attempted to determine what characteristics were most important to OHV owners.

Question 11: What is the minimum trail length you feel is needed for an enjoyable OHV facility? (snowmobile)

Trail Length (snowmobile)

Number

Percentage*

20 – 40 Miles

22

14.3

40 – 60 Miles

47

30.5

60 – 100 Miles

39

25.3

More than 100 Miles

46

29.9

*Percentage is calculated based on a total of 154 responses to this part of the question. Some respondents that did not own snowmobiles marked an answer for this question; as a result there are 154 responses rather than 151.

Question 11: What is the minimum trail length you feel is needed for an enjoyable OHV facility? (ATV/Trail Bike)

Trail Length (ATV/Trail Bike)

Number

Percentage*

5 – 10 Miles

26

24.3

10 – 20 Miles

42

39.3

More than 20 Miles

39

36.4

*Percentage is calculated based on a total of 107 responses to this part of the question.

Question 12: What factors make an OHV course challenging?

Factor

Number

Percentage*

Topography

164

77.4

Turns

128

60.4

Obstacles

86

40.6

Other**

38

17.9

No Answer

7

3.3

*Percentage is calculated based on 212 surveys evaluated. Respondents could select more than one answer so the total percentage exceeds 100 percent.

**A majority of those that responded "other" to this question indicated that scenery and hills made a course challenging. It should be noted that many respondents stated that a challenge was not what they were looking for in a trail facility. Responses included the following:

100s of miles of trails connecting amenities.

Challenging is not a factor.

Condition of the trail.

Creek crossings, mud bogs and hi